![]() In a situation like this, comparing spending $600 for a product purchase with spending "only" $40 per month for a year sounds innocuous, only within the "box" of the year containment scenario as it essentially is asking the narrow question, "Would you rather spend $600 or just "$480?" But, people like me will use a product for at least 2 years, perhaps 3 years before getting another upgrade. I will buy something like Photoshop, or Dreamweaver out of necessity or because there is increased value and upgrades that I must have to do what I want to do or need to do. I use the products in a very small business, mostly in photography and associated websites, with a few clients mixed in for good measure. But, is it really? I, and I would guess many others, are not "power users" who use many Adobe products and are constantly buying upgrades whenever they come out. ![]() Talking about how much we, the buyer, can save over the course of a year, makes this sales pitch seem more palatable. Corporations generally (or always) make their decisions based upon increasing profits but always use the spin of benefits to the buyer. I realize this is a late post for this thread, but am at this state of mind and dilemma at this time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |